Google
 

Friday, March 23, 2007

Dem's Vote For Retreat; Bush Vows To Use The V-word

The Washington Times

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A sharply divided House voted Friday to order President Bush to bring combat troops home from Iraq next year, a victory for Democrats in an epic war-powers struggle and Congress' boldest challenge yet to the administration's policy.

Just over an hour later, an angry Bush accused Democrats of staging nothing more than political theater and said that if the spending bill is not approved and signed into law by April 15, troops and their families "will face significant disruptions."

Ignoring Bush's promised veto, lawmakers voted 218-212, mostly along party lines, for a binding war spending bill requiring that combat operations cease before September 2008, or earlier if the Iraqi government does not meet certain requirements. Democrats said it was time to heed the mandate of their election sweep last November, which gave them control of Congress.

[...]

Joined at the White House by veterans and service family members, Bush said: "A narrow majority in the House of Representatives abdicated its responsibility by passing a war spending bill that has no chance of becoming law and brings us no closer to getting the troops the resources they need to do their job.

"These Democrats believe that the longer they can delay funding for our troops, the more likely they are to force me to accept restrictions on our commanders, an artificial timetable for withdrawal and their pet spending projects. This is not going to happen."

It took 3 months for Pelosi to "do god knows what" in order to secure the votes needed to pass the retreat bill. This "war funding" bill is also pork-laden with nonsense spending. Among one of those projects is to reimburse farm owners for the deepfreeze global warming on farmland this past winter.

 ***UPDATE***

A list of the pork projects included in the Retreat bill can be found here and the PDF version here